7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 2 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. 9 VELJON JEANELLE COMBS, ) Department: 403 Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 Defendant is not named as an individual in the FAC, he is only named in his capacity as a trustee. 11 ) The Hon. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 5 ) On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. Plaintiff Anita Florke (Plaintiff) filed the complaint against defendant San Francisco North/Petaluma KOA (SFPKOA) in Petaluma, she fell and suffered injuries as a result of a dangerous condition which Defendant negligently allowed or caused. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 5 9 RODNEL MAGAT, ) Department: 403 A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Department 22. ) Law & Motion Calendars Informal Discovery Calendars Tentative Rulings Court Reporting Forms & Filing Local Forms Judicial Council Forms Self-Prep and File Fee Schedule Self-Help Being Your Own Lawyer About the SHC/FLF Divorce or Separation Child Custody & Parenting Child Support Abuse & Harassment Guardianship Conservatorship Landlord/Tenant There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. ) 11 ) Id., 4-5. Department rules are available here. His life and legacy. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Central Court, 800 North Humboldt, San Mateo. ) There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. Attorneys offices are only located in California. 5 (Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2004.). (CCP 437.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 LORENA HERNANDEZ, ) Department: 403 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 8]. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. ) Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. An ex parte hearing is urgent and is requested by one party with short notice to the opposing party. See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). ) (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) San Francisco, CA 94102 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff continued to suffer symptoms as detailed in the complaint and in September 2020 sought further medical treatment at a pain clinic which resulted in a referral to a neurologist, who determined that Plaintiff had suffered a stroke with some lasting injuries. Court Clerk 11 ) The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) The Court is predominantly seeking attorneys interested in assisting incarcerated individuals with their civil actions. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. ) Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. ) 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Court Clerk Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Experience. ) ) 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 ) 5 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Please see Google Maps for a map and directions to the immigration court. (CCP 452; Schifando v. City of Los Angeles (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1074, 1081. ) ) 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 Service of Motion Papers Personal Service 16 Days Before Hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 5 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS, SEE I 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 ) However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. ) Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) ) ) 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 Judge Maria E. Evangelista Civic Center Courthouse Department 403 Court Clerk (415) 551-3741 Judge Daniel A. Flores Civic Center Courthouse Department 404 Court Clerk (415) 551-3744 Judge Roger C. Chan Civic Center Courthouse Department 405 San Francisco, CA 94102 Court Clerk (415) 551-3747 San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 5 Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH Valley Bank of Nevada, supra, 15 Cal.3d 658. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 5 ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 apply to most motions. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES 11 ) SRMH argues the following causes of action should not be allowed to proceed because Plaintiff fails to state facts sufficient to support the causes of action: (2) Negligence; (3) Violation of EMTALA Statute; (4) Personal Injury; (5) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; (6) Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress; (7) Wage Loss; (8) Loss of Earning Capacity; (9) Negligent Supervision; (10) Possible Diminution of Life Span; and (11) Punitive Damages. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 11 ) ) ) Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) Plaintiff Gloria Aguilera (Plaintiff), filed the complaint against defendants Baltazar Lopez Guzman, Arnulfo Garcia Mendoza (together Defendants) along with Does 1-100, arising out of an automobile related incident (the Complaint). 5 A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. ) (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. ) Courtroom I. ) ) ) In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 9:11-13.) ) Sacramento County Superior Court has four courtrooms that handle petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, Department 24, Department 29, Department 31 and Department 42. ) ) 5 ) 11 ) ) ) 11 ) ) 11 ) ) 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. Unscheduled motions will not be heard. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. ) ) ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 will be able to access it on trellis. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 ) ) CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). (650) 261-5122. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dept. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. 5 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. It is now for . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 (2) San Francisco Immigration Court: Address: 630 Sansome Street, 4th Floor, Room 475 San Francisco, CA 94111. 9 LEEANN JEANETTE BAILEY, ) Department: 403 The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. 5 6 JESSE H KONIUK, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794578 ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 5 ) 11 ) ) 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 See also Mitchell v. Sup. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. ) An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). ) Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods 5 ) When I go to file stuff in the clerk's office it's great to see all the grungy bike messengers mixed up with the attorneys, and the clerk windows have a really sexy art deco font painted everywhere. A motion to strike may attack any irrelevant, false, or improper matter in any pleading, or to strike a pleading that is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state. (CCP 436.) 9 ASHLEY ELISABETH COLAGROSS, ) Department: 404 Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing 10 Days After Service of Notice > > Read More.. Cut-Off Date. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. 11 ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 ) San Francisco, CA 94102 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. The Motion is GRANTED. Finally, as Plaintiff and Joe argue, Joe is not a party to this litigation and has not himself put his own medical condition at issue. 5 ) The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. ) No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. ) It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. Filings will be accepted by mail to 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, or in the civil filing drop box located on the first floor of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse . CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). All pending and newly filed civil cases are assigned to one of five Civil Judges for all purposes. Code 3294. 5 (Subd (e) amended and relettered effective January 1, 2004; adopted as part of subd (d).). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) ) The court must not require any other form of citation. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. ) ) 5 ) 6 ROMISEH PAKZADIAN, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774399 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. 11 ) ) ) 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 ) After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 ) Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. ) (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 WARREN W. PRINGLE III, ) Department: 403 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Tentative Rulings for Civil and Family Law matters. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). ) Dept. 5 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ) ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 12 ) ) 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED.
Orlando Police Department Orlando, Fl, Fivem Player Owned Business, Single Level Homes For Sale Tualatin Oregon, Articles S